Sources

Every source Caus can observe, its reliability, coverage, and confidence impact.

Source Coverage Summary

Across all signals

4

Available Sources

2

Limited Sources

1

Unavailable Sources

58%

Coverage Score

Missing-source warning: Some categories are limited or unavailable this cycle. Coverage gaps reduce confidence but are never inferred or estimated.

Source Coverage

What Caus can observe — how much of the relevant public evidence landscape is currently accessible across all source categories.

Confidence

How reliable the current signal is based on available evidence. Missing sources are reported as coverage gaps, never inferred.

Source categories

Public web / news

Available
Reliability88%
Coverage92%

Broad publisher coverage with strong independence checks.

Last Checked 1 min ago+ Strong positive

RSS feeds

Available
Reliability82%
Coverage86%

High recency, good for mention velocity baselines.

Last Checked 2 min ago+ Positive

Market data

Limited
Reliability71%
Coverage44%

Partial feed access caps confidence ceiling this cycle.

Last Checked 8 min ago~ Reduced

Filings / regulatory sources

Limited
Reliability90%
Coverage38%

High reliability but sparse coverage for this topic.

Last Checked 22 min ago~ Neutral

Social / video metadata

Available
Reliability58%
Coverage74%

High volume, higher duplicate risk — heavily deduplicated.

Last Checked 3 min ago~ Mixed

Forums / community sources

Available
Reliability64%
Coverage69%

Useful early-interest signal, weighted for independence.

Last Checked 5 min ago+ Positive

Private / unavailable sources

Unavailable
Reliability0%
Coverage0%

Not observable. Shown as a coverage gap, never inferred.

Last Checked − Coverage gap

Source Categories

Confidence impact per source category

SourceStatusReliabilityCoverageLast CheckedConfidence Impact
Public web / newsAvailable88%92%1 min ago+ Strong positive
RSS feedsAvailable82%86%2 min ago+ Positive
Market dataLimited71%44%8 min ago~ Reduced
Filings / regulatory sourcesLimited90%38%22 min ago~ Neutral
Social / video metadataAvailable58%74%3 min ago~ Mixed
Forums / community sourcesAvailable64%69%5 min ago+ Positive
Private / unavailable sourcesUnavailable− Coverage gap

How Caus weighs sources

Caus does not treat every source equally. It weighs source reliability, independence, recency, coverage, and duplicate risk before evidence contributes to a Signal Score.

Reliability

How trustworthy a source has been historically.

Independence

Whether evidence is original or syndicated from elsewhere.

Recency

How fresh the evidence is relative to baseline.

Coverage

How much of the relevant landscape the source observes.

Duplicate risk

Likelihood of repeated or reposted content inflating volume.