Sources
Every source Caus can observe, its reliability, coverage, and confidence impact.
Source Coverage Summary
Across all signals4
Available Sources
2
Limited Sources
1
Unavailable Sources
58%
Coverage Score
Missing-source warning: Some categories are limited or unavailable this cycle. Coverage gaps reduce confidence but are never inferred or estimated.
Source Coverage
What Caus can observe — how much of the relevant public evidence landscape is currently accessible across all source categories.
Confidence
How reliable the current signal is based on available evidence. Missing sources are reported as coverage gaps, never inferred.
Source categories
Public web / news
AvailableBroad publisher coverage with strong independence checks.
RSS feeds
AvailableHigh recency, good for mention velocity baselines.
Market data
LimitedPartial feed access caps confidence ceiling this cycle.
Filings / regulatory sources
LimitedHigh reliability but sparse coverage for this topic.
Social / video metadata
AvailableHigh volume, higher duplicate risk — heavily deduplicated.
Forums / community sources
AvailableUseful early-interest signal, weighted for independence.
Private / unavailable sources
UnavailableNot observable. Shown as a coverage gap, never inferred.
Source Categories
Confidence impact per source category
| Source | Status | Reliability | Coverage | Last Checked | Confidence Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public web / news | Available | 88% | 92% | 1 min ago | + Strong positive |
| RSS feeds | Available | 82% | 86% | 2 min ago | + Positive |
| Market data | Limited | 71% | 44% | 8 min ago | ~ Reduced |
| Filings / regulatory sources | Limited | 90% | 38% | 22 min ago | ~ Neutral |
| Social / video metadata | Available | 58% | 74% | 3 min ago | ~ Mixed |
| Forums / community sources | Available | 64% | 69% | 5 min ago | + Positive |
| Private / unavailable sources | Unavailable | — | — | — | − Coverage gap |
How Caus weighs sources
Caus does not treat every source equally. It weighs source reliability, independence, recency, coverage, and duplicate risk before evidence contributes to a Signal Score.
Reliability
How trustworthy a source has been historically.
Independence
Whether evidence is original or syndicated from elsewhere.
Recency
How fresh the evidence is relative to baseline.
Coverage
How much of the relevant landscape the source observes.
Duplicate risk
Likelihood of repeated or reposted content inflating volume.